Just remember, these are the official numbers and should be the gospel as to what the Camaro is and is not capable of, regardless of the test conditions and/or the driver. That was/is the standard of measurement when talking about other makes and models like the Mustang and the Challenger, so we need to be consistent in how we use magazine review numbers.
I don't care what someone else is able to get out of the car on an actual track, these numbers MUST be used whenever a comparison is being made on the internet. Agreed?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MotorTrend
A set of esses ahead, the steering rouses to attention, arcing right and left with fluid precision. The slightest dead spot resides on-center, but otherwise the helm and its 15.7:1 ratio communicate clearly. So does the Track Pack chassis, whose unique struts, rear lower control arm, and rear anti-roll bar, not to mention stiffer dampers and rear springs, minimize body movement to levels previously unseen in a factory Mustang GT. Maximum lateral grip is a tenacious 0.95 g.
|
Well, looks like we will need to keep the Camaro on the dragstrip. Afterall, if the 2010 Mustang GT is only a one-trick quarter-mile pony with it's handling numbers, the Camaro is going to be downright dangerous!