View Single Post
Old 09-21-2011, 08:58 PM   #12
DarkneSS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Westchester, New York
Posts: 3,715
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGOS252382 View Post
The 350z guys would love this thread.

350z is a high 13 sec car. With excellent driving in good conditions, they can run mid 13s.

Low 13s are extremely rare (comparable to running mid 12s in a stock Camaro SS).

The last time I checked the stock 1/4 mile list from a popular 350z forum, only a few guys had run low 13s. Most the times in the top 10 were in the mid 13s.

But that's considerably faster than a V6 Camaro.
No no and no you are looking at times for the HR Zs. HR Z is different animal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMM1181 View Post
I'd say that pretty much any year manual Z should beat a V6 Camaro (minus the roadster), even the earliest models, if driven correctly.

In the real world, it's a driver's race, but even the oldest and slowest Z had the potential and more than a few drivers who were able to run 13.6-13.7's stock. There is absolutely zero potential in the V6 2010-2011 Camaro for a 13.6-13.7 stock, they would be happy with low 14's.
No no...and no again. Any non HR Z my team and I would run anytime because we saw how slow they actually are. They are mid to high 14 second cars stock get over it. Manual v6 will slaughter any Non HR Z.

Make that clarification because non HR is slower!
DarkneSS is offline   Reply With Quote