View Single Post
Old 09-26-2011, 01:24 PM   #40
JMM1181
 
Drives: '07 350z
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by gjarzabek009 View Post
And other magazines rate the camaro at 14.3,14.4,14.2 etc... as well as better 0-60 times. Good job on comparing the worse camaro times against the best 350z times lol.
Then you choose the professional review and post it here. I just posted the first ones I found, don't care to cherry pick.

Find the best possible quarter mile times you can for the new V6 Camaro, and the worst possible for the 350z for all I care, but make sure you correctly call them out by model year and provide links for everyone.

In the end, it doesn't really make a difference. We see the real world V6 Camaro times posted above which proves it is not a low 14 second car, but rather more of a mid-14 second car. In fact, according to that official list, no one has gotten below a 14.4x. If the car truly had the potential I think we would have seen at least a glimpse of it by now, don't you?
JMM1181 is offline   Reply With Quote