Quote:
Originally Posted by camaroitalia
i still think u should help me out!
i would like to stick between the 2010's. that way it is similar, for year wise. Also, it will help prove the point that i am trying to make the camaro is better.
My introductory is good, only making an outline right now
first paragraph gonna do it on styling (exterior, interior) i need help on wording this! lol
second, power/performance (HP, TQ, MPG)
third, on packages offered (RS package/Premium PKG. Here i will mention the 2012's gt500/ZL1 magnetic ride, more hp in zl1)
|
Just throwing this out there, but you seem to be cherry picking your argument, especially by including the 2012 ZL1 in your 2010 vs. 2010 paper (and ignoring the MY2011 Mustangs altogether) which at least IMO would come off as bad as some magazine articles where you can almost see the money trail dicatating the winner.
Your paper would stand up better if it just focused on the 2010 vs. 2010
The easiest argument for the Camaro you can make here is that the Camaro was a more comprehinsively equipped car at a slightly higher price point in comparison and when you ticked off the options for the Mustang it ended up being more expensive yet still could not be had with some features like the IRS and a 400+ HP engine in the regular car.
Is this just a persuasive paper your turning in to your instructor (who may or may not be a car enthusiast) and/or is this gonna be some peer reviewed project with the possiblity of a Mustang nutswinger waiting in the wings to drop an atomic bomb on your work?