Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Nuke
 if your depending on your car to ensure your OK, LAZY PEOPLE, and we have a butt load of them in the world, will depend on them, and when some of them about drop dead or do drop dead, they will SUE and probably win.....becasue they weren't warned enough. |
I'm afraid I don't agree on the Lazy argument.
I'm not sure if you guys even read the article. Essentially the end-state vision is to have monitors/devices embedded within various areas of the car [e.g. steering , seat etc] . These monitors capture your health data [heart rate,glucose level] and leverage the MS cloud platforms like HealthVault etc and tell you if you are in danger of a life threatening condition [e.g. increased heart rate in high risk heart patients etc] . Maybe even prevent you from drinking and driving. And you guys think these are meaningless features?
I think you actually missed the main point of the post. The main point being FORD is getting aggressive on its vision of providing In-car technology services [Health Management is just one] where GM does not seem to have anything concrete laid out in that space. The point of the post was to discuss that.