|
I have owned 5 Mustangs. 1965, 1983, 2001, 1991, and 1995. I never was satisfied with any of them. The 1991 was a street burner, 630+rwhp. It was a younger mans car. The Camaro has the look of a more refined, mature if you would, car. If you are going after the young punk wanna be look, by all means, please stick with the Mustang so not to bring the Camaro down to that level.
Ford has made strides to improve the Mustang, but it still looks like the last 2.5 Million others on the road. Do you want to confuse your car with someone else's just because you couldn't wait for a Camaro?
The aftermarket has thousands of parts for the LS3 already from its time in the Corvette. Hell, I'm putting a twin turbo setup on my Camaro that will put down 600+rwhp. Its all a matter of what you like and what your willing to put YOUR money down on.
Nothing is worse than buyers remorse on a car. When you trade it in, if you go upside down, its a terrible cycle that is very hard to get back on top of. I started that cycle with a '97 Z28 that snapped the rearend and tranny with just over 5k miles.
But, like everyone else here, I have a new Camaro bias. Good luck with your purchase either way you go.
__________________
UNDER CONSTRUCTION......again......
|