View Single Post
Old 02-16-2012, 12:46 PM   #49
Doc
Dances With Mustangs
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS/RS MT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 3,819
It would be nice if someone could have a discussion about concerns they have without all the "tin foil" condescending put-downs and smart-ass remarks.

On the one hand if you have Onstar and your car is stolen and recovered as a result of Onstar, that would be a good thing. If you are involved in an accident and are trapped in the car or are unconscious and Onstar was able to get help to you and save your life, that would be a good thing.

On the other hand, if you go in to your dealer for a service call and they plug their computers into your car's computer, and that data which has everything you've done in the car is sent to the city/county/state, you could be ticketed/fined and if your insurance company is given that data, they could raise your rates or even cancel you if the data shows you were greatly exceeding the speed limit. That would not be a good thing. The fact that you were on a track when you did that might escape their attention but go ahead and try to "correct" a mistake like that in the system once it's made.

If the data implies you are a "danger and threat" to "public health and safety" and a disable command is sent shutting down your car; you now have a car that you paid/are paying for which some bureaucrat has legally disabled and it's now completely useless to you. And you also have a record now of being a "danger and threat to public safety" which of course would dramatically affect your job, career and status in society. Imagine how you'd be treated if you were pulled over by a cop and he runs your plate and that warning pops up on his screen.

There are extreme possibilities on both sides of the coin. Question is, does the good out-weigh the bad and how carefully has that been considered? As long as it's optional then you have the freedom of choice to use it or not. The moment you are forced by government to accept something that should be optional; it becomes a tyranny. That I think is the main concern.

The only thing preventing tyranny is lack of infrastructure and means to enforce it; the mentality is certainly there. Did you know in North Korea people who were seen "not grieving enough" at the recent funeral of dear departed dictator were rounded up and sent to labor camps? The mentality for that kind of tyranny is active and out there; mocking someone's concerns over it's possible establishment and growth is extremely foolish, naive and short-sighted.

It's much better to intelligently and rationally discuss it in a civil manner so everyone can be informed and aware, because only then do we have a chance to safeguard our hard-won liberties.
__________________

Blue Angel is here!!
1SS/RS LS3 M6 IBM
Doc is offline   Reply With Quote