Quote:
Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N
That's a misconception
Dyno Dynamics are load based dyno's, just like Mustang Dyno's.
They are better tuning tools, but the numbers they spit out are much more erratic. They can be made to show almost anything and most have corrections to get similar numbers you would see on a DynoJet, but are easy to fudge as well because the load based dyno's have much more criteria to fill in while DynoJets have MUCH less variables.
BTW, the 364 rwhp we saw before was on a DynoJet and was corrected to SAE. This dyno run seems as if it wasn't (probably STD) but even if it were corrected to SAE, it is not directly comparable to dyno runs that are typically seen on the net (DynoJet).
Also, another note. The LS3 is not underrated, its SAE Certified, it can't be underrated. It must make within +-1% of its rated power.
|
Do you have the SAE spec that says that? I hear that alot (it can't be underrated) but nobody can show where it says that it has to be that close. It is not that I think it is overrated, I would just like to see the spec.