View Single Post
Old 05-07-2009, 11:12 AM   #113
BlownChevy
 
Drives: 2015 1SS RS 1LE
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTron View Post
While true, remember every supercharger has a peak efficiency level at a specific boost level/rpm of the rotors ect, while it might be possible to use the 1900 to make the same power, maybe for the boost they want to run the 2300 has a better efficiency curve, making it a better overall choice.

I don't actually know any numbers to substantiate my opinion, so if i'm wrong here, let me know
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColeJJones View Post
obviously a larger displacement charger will use less boost to make the same power because it will flow at a larger CFM, and that can be less heat which is what roots style chargers are known for and probably what they are going for here. but it is more expensive for this charger which is useless unless you plan on huge power. i think its over kill for a kit. if it came in stages, this would be a stage 3+, stage 1 and 2 would be the 1900. just because you can do it doesnt mean you should. think nos

These supercharegers do not have any issues with heat. We are using the 2300 because the market demanded it, and it leaves more room for the folks that are going to run the larger displacement engines in the future.
BlownChevy is offline   Reply With Quote