View Single Post
Old 05-10-2009, 03:05 PM   #21
fireresq157

 
fireresq157's Avatar
 
Drives: 1997 SS & 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by nards444 View Post
In all reality specially for people in the north this car isnt a everyday driver, thus all of these options are unessary and wont be used half of the time. But like i said a lot of people will order all this stuff just so they can say they have it. But again to each his own, but my main point is these options just dont make sense, and you would have to agree you can find one where you can say that is stupif.
I plan on using most if not all the features and I don't think they are "stupid".
Just because you don't have the car you want at the price your willing to pay does not make it a universal problem. God I want everyone to be happy with this car but their always be things that you can do without that you did not want to pay for. Not everyone's income and financial stability is the same for all I know your loaded and just don't like throwing money away. I personally think GM should of matched the Mustangs price across the board so their would be no price comparison argument. That would of meant an average savings of 2 thousand dollars of the current price. I can argue your point on some features that I don't need or want myself but realize the rules of the game all have already been laid out years ago for various reasons some of those I posted in my previous post. This is nothing new as far as limiting options and choices and has been going on in the car world for over 30 years. Try to enjoy your options and choices I know I will. PS about 2 years ago GM had a survey for the Camaro loyalists and fans and they dealt with all the options and choices . Thousands voted on it so what you have with the current Camaro is essentially the peoples choice on what they wanted to see and what they would pay for.
fireresq157 is offline   Reply With Quote