View Single Post
Old 04-24-2012, 10:22 PM   #10
Fiftydriver

 
Fiftydriver's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SSRS RJT L99
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fort Shaw, Montana
Posts: 1,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by camarostar2010 View Post
I am no expert but bigger engines usually seem to rev less on the rpm band. I mean as in less total rpm capability in general. So it a trade off mostly. They give more torque but rev a lots less. Plus the long stroke put stress on the block and the sides of the pistons. again this is what I have seen written on some similar articles.
The Maggie and Whipple do their best work at low RPM.....

I can see the added stress on the pistons but I thought the LSX and RHS blocks were designed specifically for long strokes and full piston support?
__________________
Fiftydriver

2010 SSRS, RJTC, L99, Maggie 2300 SC, 3.4" pulley, Roto-Fab CAI, Dynatech Supermaxx LT headers, Dynatech High Flow cats, Corsa Cat back exhaust, Dual Elite Engineering catch can, MSD wires and Jannetty custom tune, JRE custom diff w/ posi mod, 3.91 LPE gears, Pfaht trailing arms, Pfaht trailing arm and Diff bushings, drop springs and sport sway bars front and back, Fesler dual guage pillar pod w/ AM Cobalt Boost and A/F guages.

More to come!!
Fiftydriver is offline   Reply With Quote