Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBear
You are correct that I won't win the lottery, because I never have, and I never will buy a lottery ticket.
Let's be accurate, as the time slip in question indicates a 60 foot time of 1.6981 seconds and not 1.6000 seconds. The 1.6981 second time may not be likely, but it's not impossible. That's my point.
I don't claim that the ZL1 did run the 1.6981 60 foot time on stock Goodyears. I'm claiming that just because the ZL1 did run a 1.6981 60 foot time, doesn't unequivally prove that that time was run on Drag Radials. There is a difference between the two positions.
I'm still waiting for unequivocal proof that the ZL1 did not run a 1.681 60 foot time on the stock Goodyears.
And your unequivocal proof is?
I'm not claiming it was or it wasn't with Drag Radials. I'm claiming that a 1.6981 second 60 foot time, in and of itself, doesn't unequivocally prove that the time was run on Drag Radials.
I'm not implying that the ZL1 is capable of a better 60 foot time that a ZR1. I didn't intended for you to infer that. I simply stated that for a truly accurate comparison one must use the same driver and the same track on the same day.
|
Well the 60 foot time of 1.6X that you have listed for the ZL1 is better than any 60 foot time posted by a stock ZR1... take that how you will. I have been drag racing at the track for a long time. I have never ever ever seen a RWD car pull a 1.6X 60 foot time on stock tires... its unheard of.