Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcAngel
I dont get you guys if at 315/325 the Mustang is .2 sec slower and .5 seconds slower in the 1/4 what the hell do you think it would do with 426/400.
|
How is that relevant? The Mustang isn't at 426/400, so the argument ends there. The only reason there is even an argument is that the Mustang is considerably lighter, which is great! The second reason it's viable is that everyone is comparing the track pack mustang to a fully loaded with features 2SS/RS. Compare the base model of each V8 (bare bones GT to barebones 1SS) and the numbers will tell a better story, in my opinion.