Quote:
Originally Posted by MerF
I need sources for common sense?
Ok.
A and B) It's a N/A 5.0L, which means it's going to have to be considerably high c/r to achieve those numbers...or high revving...both of which will mean it's going to be heavily tuned (expensive to engineer) and probably require high octane. It also means unless it is direct injection (is it?) it's not going to handle very much boost without lowering the c/r (decreasing the factory numbers back down to normal in the first place).
C) If you actually belive a new car cna come out without weighing more and being more expensive then you are in the same pipedream that Camaro owners were before the numbers were released on our car.
Better than LLN. I'll concede for now, but I'm still not 100% convinced yet. I reserve that right as a Camaro fanboy.  |
Just pointing out that noone answered after I was called out and responded.
Convenient.
And stop comparing the heaviest version of the Camaro's handling with the "track pack" of the Mustang. 1SS versus base GT. Camaro wins every time, I would be willing to bet.