I don't know why everyone's giving her so much crap, I just did a quick google search, and the numbers for the SRT vs the SS are pretty damn close. So the SRT is maybe a tenth quicker to 60, and a tad quicker in the 1/4 mile? It's not as a big a spread as some of you are making it out to be.
From Motortrend:
2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Super Bee
BASE PRICE $41,000 (MT est)
PRICE AS TESTED $41,000 (MT est)
VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine, RWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan
ENGINE 6.4L/470-hp/470-lb-ft OHV 16-valve V-8
TRANSMISSION 5-speed automatic
CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 4271 lb (54/46%)
WHEELBASE 120.2 in
LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 200.3 x 74.2 x 58.3 in
0-60 MPH 4.4 sec QUARTER MILE 12.8 sec @ 112.6 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 112 ft
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.91 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 25.5 sec @ 0.76 g (avg)
EPA CITY/HWY FUEL ECON 14/23 mpg
ENERGY CONS, CITY/HWY 241/147 kW-hrs/100 mi
CO2 EMISSIONS 1.14 lb/mi
Read more:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz1xtrTUcIU
They're nice cars though; I'd take one. Still not as good looking as the Camaro.