Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye
6.0 Liter LS3?
Anyways, no matter what engine gets used...Don't underestimate it due to displaacement, or whatnot. Wait for the numbers before you judge to harshly. I remember people doing that about the L76 at first in the G8. Some laughed.
Look what it did to the Charger. GM is on this.
Mark my words, no matter what engine gets popped in, We WON'T be disapointed. It'll have AFM, and 400 horses (at the very least in the way of features). Anybody really wanna complain about that? 
|
vette ls3- 430 hp ...
camaro ls3- 400hp lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3
LS3 doesn't have AFM and isn't 6.0L. So unless the information posted is total garbage, then it can't be a variant of the LS3. AFM can be added to an engine with a little bit of work, but the displacement issue doesn't have such an easy work around.
|
well, he did make a mistake on a 3.9 v-6
Quote:
|
Just spoke to Jim. And then we had to call GM. Peper misspoke. He said 3.9 but it is the same 3.6 liter as in the Traverse. Sorry for the confusion.
|
so whos to say he forgot a .2 on the engine size?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye
Just so everyones "clear" it's not terribly difficult for GM to put AFM on an engine.  So, just because it's got AFM, doesn't rule anything out. 
|
danke