Quote:
Originally Posted by MerF
Tag, and company, this is a Mustang dyno. Those are the absolute worse examples of a dyno I've ever come across.
God this sucks, I'm not trying to be the pessimist here but it's only fair to point out how consistently AWFUL Mustang dynos are. They do require operator input to do their job and they "guess" about power instead of giving the numbers like a conventional dyno. I've been at shows (plural!) that had Mustang dynos there and people were getting 600 ft/lbs of torque on their bot-on 4-bangers...then I watched a mildly upgraded (still stock twins) Supra pull like 1200 ft/lbs. No kidding at one show right after watching one of these Honda owners get all excited, I watch a classic V8 get told it only had 195 ft/lbs but 800 rwhp. In natrual fashion, the ricer believed the numbers and proceeded to high-five his buddies.
In other words, I wish you the best Tag that would be awesome...but don't hold your breath by any means.
|
Oh, I'm not...which is exactly why we are going to redyno this bad boy...Don't know when, but I'll post up the result as soon as I can.
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz282003
I think an important thing to remember are the gains from the mods'  Sure, the baseline numbers can be fudged (I won't speculate if that was/wasn't the case) but the proof is in the improvement of the parts, and it seems like there was a good improvement.
JMVHO 
Respectfully... |
exactly. however, those #'s WOULD be cool if they were real!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMtothecore
very sweet TAG, congrats......
I'm gonna have to swing down to SA when I get mine later this summer.
|
Just let me know when! A few of us can get together!
Oh...and here ya go...