View Single Post
Old 08-02-2012, 01:55 PM   #41
Witt
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Witt's Avatar
 
Drives: Locomotives
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Aliquippa PA
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by strych9 View Post
A lot of misinformation here. Here are the facts:
  1. Ethanol burns colder and thus produces less energy per volume than its non-ethanol counterpart. This results in reduced MPG when ethanol is used
  2. There is no by-product in ethanol gas that adds any more contaminants from combustion than non-ethanol gas. No "gunk" at all
  3. Ethanol does not have detrimental issues with plastics and rubber seals, etc. Methanol, however, is corrosive to these materials
  4. Modern vehicles from mid-90's and up are designed to work best using 10% ethanol-blended fuel. They are calibrated to get the best balance of power and economy using ethanol fuel
  5. In many areas, the only way you can get 93 octane fuel is to use ethanol. The "regular" version of the same brand of fuel is typically 91 octane, or 89 octane
Hope this helps you.
Great info!

Edit: I would like to add to your list, and this applies to e10, e85, and e100 mixes that just because ethanol contains less energy per unit it simply means you have to burn more fuel per unit of air, not that the engine makes less power on ethanol blended fuel. There are benefits and consequences to this, mainly cooler intake air charge resulting in more power due to detonation resistance and less mpg because of the additional fuel used, which you covered.
__________________
Certified Internet Master Mechanic
Witt is offline   Reply With Quote