06-04-2009, 12:25 AM
|
#126
|
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ffrcobra_65
Ok, just going to tease you a bit.  You are no Mustang Loyalist. Shoot, look around..you are in Camaro land trying so hard to convince yourself that your butt ugly Pustang is better than the Camaro when deep down, you really wish you have a Camaro. Come on, stop denying yourself, you really want a  Camaro. Mustangs are FUGLY! Takes a Saleen and Roush to make them look good and perform better. Shelby GT500 are nose heavy and useless around a track unless you spend thousands more to upgrade the suspension....The new Camaros are MUSCLE cars with the looks and performance right off the show room floor. Just wait til the after-market stuff catches up with the Camaros. By the time Pustangs get the 400 HP, the Camaro LT will have 404hp.  |
Re-read that. Its nearly 100% subjective.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|