View Single Post
Old 03-27-2008, 11:47 PM   #45
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by melvin View Post
I just can't understand what would make the engineers change the angle of the B-Pillar. Would it really be any less functional to have it flow with the angle of the door. Maybe they have a reason for it, but to me it just looks like it got overlooked. Oh well...it's not gonna stop me from getting one. Everything else looks great.
The further the piece leans, the more stress is introduced into the structure. When the load is not vertical, it exerts a torque around the lower pivot point. Try holding a baseball bat at 30 degrees off vertical vs straight up. It takes a whole lot more force to keep it in place when its angled. The same hold true for the pillars on cars. This means that the same sized pillar won't support the same weight resulting in the need for reinforcement. Unless you can triangulate the braces like a roll cage, its better to keep loads linear.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote