View Single Post
Old 06-10-2009, 11:07 AM   #38
alex33x
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: El Paso, Tx
Posts: 687
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
but did you ensure you were in 1st when you started?

also, 320rwhp in a 3500lb car compared to ~370rwhp in a 4000lb car
I dont quite get what youre trying to compare here, but if its the camaro. It's not 4000lb its 3860lb, but even if it was a 4000lb car the weight to power ratio that you posted would be about the same.

3500 / 320 = 10.76
4000 / 370 = 10.81

I dont understand why people get so worked off about weight.

Now this are flywheel numbers.

WS6 Trans Am 3500 / 325 = 10.76
Camaro SS 3860 / 426 = 9.06

For a Trans am to have the same weight to power ratio as the camaro it would need to have 386hp, so there's thats 61 more horses in power to be in sub par with the Camaro and only 30 less than what the camaro has stock.

You do the math.
__________________
Devliered July 20, 2012
alex33x is offline   Reply With Quote