Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessika@SCC
Well, it makes sense for the corvette guys..(who this was designed for). The only option they had for positive displacement was the E-force. Anything else required a hood replacement, which made getting supercharged a 10k deal.
|
and that was only for the C6
Quote:
Originally Posted by oachalon
I have a friend that has a c5 vette. Will magnuson offer a version that works on the LS1 and still fits under the hood?
|
hmm, that would've been nice a couple years ago
Quote:
Originally Posted by old motorhead
It ought to at least be as capable as a 1:1 rear drive Maggie TVS2300. Or at least as capable as an older TVS2300 front drive. With a 3.1 or 3.2" front pulley, either of those can do high 600's rwhp on a well put together LS3. Isn't there supposed to be some "magic" with the new intercooler system? I think your hp est is a tad low for the new TVS. I do agree that the pulley system necessary for 1000 hp wouldn't be able to be recreated anywhere except on a dyno motor.
|
yeah, a guy's building a 2300 LS7 with a ridiculous belt setup - tiny 8rib on the front with a 14rib overdrive on the back (if i remember right) - still waiting on numbers, but supposed to be over 1000. crazy it took that much to get there. i'm going for a measly 700+
should be able to make that on mine with a rear cog OD & front 8rib
Quote:
Originally Posted by old motorhead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessika@SCC
I agree. But the 3.1,3.2 will still slip, which leaves you with a 3.4 as the possible smallest. Even that can slip...
Supposedly it dynoed at 40 more hp, vs a regular 2300, on that corvette. But I am skeptical. Until I see independent test results I will reserve judgement.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
|
I want to see that extra hp at similar boost too. It has to be more than just cooler air. BTW. I have no belt slip with a 3.1" pulley on my front drive Maggie 2300 (11.5psi) and no slip with a 3.3" pulley on my rear drive Maggie (9.5psi) |
yeah, i'm running a 2.9 6rib on my 2300 and killed my slip by using a .75" shorter belt. that's at 11psi on my LS1 (with relatively big exhaust - that's why the boost is low)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessika@SCC
On camaros?
I ran a 3.1 on my car, but the tensioner system was different than that of the camaro...
sent from my Note2 using Tapatalk
|
ORLY? is there less wrap on the snout pulley for thee camaros?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blown5thgen
You'd be making a lot more on a d1sc. Remember maggie been around long time for LS3 vettes. It's a proven platform. No magic to them.
Just isn't enough blower.... especially for bigger/high hp engines.
|
ok, making a higher peak hp number... and?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hendrix-Engineering
 I havnt seen a d1 with this kind of curve |
even for a stock LS1 on 8psi (first dyno) and 10psi (second), you won't get this kind of flat torque with a centri. granted, the stock heads obviously don't flow up top, but that'll be remedied on the bigger engine
