View Single Post
Old 12-08-2012, 12:03 PM   #60
tonyko1
Banned
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Convertible, IBM
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC2150 View Post
The more oil is ingested into the intake, the more the intake valves coke up, the less efficient the engine is, the more detonation takes place, the more timing is pulled, and less power the worse the MPG.

Also, this makes using Premium (93) all the more critical to try and reduce the detonation.

Let me know if you need more details, pictures, and solutions.


Okay, it is V6, it doesn't need 93 octane........it is "tuned" from the factory to accept 87 octane as engineered. Are you going to suggest the famed 5/20 Fuse pull, ha.

Just a guess here, you are going to suggest a catch-can...........ugh.



But please, don't drag out those file photos of the super-uber carbon coated piston rods and such, it is getting old.

And you can save everyone time by linking to the mechanical section when you do your 9 page thesis on what is wrong with all engines not having a catch-can, no need to clog the thread here.

Thank you.
tonyko1 is offline   Reply With Quote