View Single Post
Old 12-11-2012, 09:41 PM   #55
tonyko1
Banned
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Convertible, IBM
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC2150 View Post
Read these threads.....and yes, those not realizing what oil ingestion does can run their car for years and not be aware of the gradual degradation. And no, GM/Ford?Chrusler, etc. probably never will add the expense and another service procedure but the super cars (Maserati, Ferrari, etc.) as well as the Copo all have catchcans as it is performance and longevity for the goal.

Tons of real data, industry info, and automotive engineer data to read on the issues. If nothing else, the small cost for a GOOD functioning one....(most let as much through as they trap) the fuel savings alone pays for the can many times over (detonation from ANY oil ingestion no matter what type fuel delivery causes detonation and the knock sensors command the PCM to pull timing, thus less power is produced and less fuel economy) much less the long term effects. I have been buiulding and rebuilding race & performance engines as well as passenger cars for over 38 years.....if you saw the insides like I and many others do, you would never question the need to separate the oil before it is ingested.

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=216311

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68744
Been waiting for you to chime in. How about giving a disclaimer that your major interest in this is that you sell them.

Sorry, but you have been most arrogant and demeaning to my lack of knowledge.

However, I do know this: V8's don't need a catch-can, and the V6's, well, maybe.

Now, back to your modus operandi of sending out your pics of the uber-dirty piston rods and then the treatise.

Face it, your # 1 goal is to sell catch-cans. God bless you, but keep it "real".

Ugh.
tonyko1 is offline   Reply With Quote