View Single Post
Old 12-13-2012, 08:27 PM   #30
1989GTA
 
Drives: 1989 GTA Trans Am
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacnJsn95 View Post
I decided to do some testing today

I mounted my LS3 head/intake/tb to the flow bench and tested the stock airbox w/ stock filter, and stock tube, then I swapped the tube out for a tube similar to that which you would find in most intake systems (4" OD 16GA aluminum tube, ~16" long, 6" CLR)... Much to my surprise the stock intake tube with it's baffles & accordion section flowed more than the tube without that stuff...

The stock tube flowed ~0.75% more (~2 CFM) than the aluminum tube did. While I didn't compare the stock tube to a Blackwing because I don't have one, I imagine the results would be similar (little to no change).

After doing this and seeing the results, IMO the tube is a waste of money, all you'd get is more intake sound due to the lack of the baffle box.

The filter: I did compare the stock filter vs an S&B filter @ .500" lift on cyl#3 through the top end assy.

The S&B filter flowed roughly 1% better through the intake system/tb/intake/head @ .500" lift... (appx 3 CFM more)...



I have... And you'd be surprised at the results.
Very interesting test. Now how does that compare to Janetty's dyno testing with all the different cold air intake systems?
1989GTA is offline   Reply With Quote