Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterCamaro69
Pedders has been kind enough to stick with us since the beginning, letting us know every step of the way what their intentions are, and where they are in design, application and testing. A new guy comes in calling BS.
Pedders has a good reputation in the market, with very good credentials, including being invited to GM's area 51 for more development... What are your credentials?
Edmunds v. Pedders... I think I'll hang with Pedders for now.
Keeping enthusiasts in the loop concerning product development rates highly in my book. We know exactly where Pedders stands in regards to how far along they are with testing, (search Pedders OLD posts) Where are the other Companies?
Here's a good example... Say I'm at the track, my setup has an issue that I can describe, but can't solve, call Pedders and ask to speak with someone about your problem. Then try the same thing with one of the competitors.
|
Here's the deal though, they are from Austrailia where the platform originated so they had the head start on development. What about dedicated road race shops like MTI, LG, Strano, DSE etc. These are Very reputable companies that make parts that flat out perform. These other shops don't have anything yet, because they are doing their R&D right now trying to create a good product, its not that they don't want to be involved. Edmunds, as far as I know, has no horse in the race on this, they are just reporting what they find. I agree with above poster, although the camaro performance was hurt by the test area (dirty, etc) the mustang still put down good numbers. Additionally, what seems worse to me, is the daily driving comfort was messed up also.
Listen, I want the Pedders stuff to flat Rock, heck, I pre-ordered the coilovers in December sight unseen, so I have to hope it rocks. I guess we will see soon enough, they said they are on the boat now.