Quote:
Originally Posted by brandotron
I would hope not but given the 10 bolt rear end in the previous generation, it wouldn't be totally unthinkable.
|
You know.. this has always bugged me.. that rear was perfectly fine for the way the car came from the factory.
It's not GM's responsibility to over-engineer parts so that people can run slicks, add blowers, or do other changes to the car.
I found it fascinating that someone would add slicks, toss on a 200 shot of nitrous and then complain that the "crappy" rear blew apart. lol
__________________
Tech Editor for Camaro Performers Magazine
1968 Camaro - 461 RHS LS 700hp, various stuff, called Bad Penny
1968 Camaro - In progress, called Track Rat
2010 Camaro - DSE Suspension, Baer 6S Brakes, Boze Wheels, Nitto NT05 Tires, JBA Exhaust and long tubes, Magnacharger TVS, 660rwhp Forged Eagle 416 LS3 short block, ADM fuel system, Lingenfelter GT-9 cam, G-Force axles, Anvil and Seibon CF parts, Centerforce Dual-Disc Clutch
www.fquick.com/steve1968ls2