View Single Post
Old 07-03-2009, 12:26 PM   #49
Steve1968LS2
 
Drives: 1968 LS2 powered - Bad Penny
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by dms View Post
Has your magazine performed a skid pad test on a new Camaro? Edmonds had a .83g, Motor Trend had .90g for the SS and a .93g for the 6 cyl with 20 inch wheels. That is a serious difference. The test on the Edmonds was done on a poorly prepped road surface, and have no idea what the Motor Trend test track was like.


We have not done one on a Camaro yet ourselves. We will be doing some significant testing next week in Texas, but will not be doing it on a base line car due to time constraints

thanks
mike
dms
Our SS test car just showed up last weekend.. we should have it tested withing the next two weeks (we have a trip to Columbus OH sucking up next week)

We will do:

200-ft skidpad
420-ft slalom (70 foot cones)
60-0 braking

Will be done bone stock. Then we will start swaping stuff out and retesting. We will also base chassis dyno the car before we start trying to get more power. I will shoot you our base numbers when I get them.. at least it will give you an idea.

Here's an old video of our slalom test. Motor trend uses s wider spacing on thier cones, but typically test older cars.

__________________
Tech Editor for Camaro Performers Magazine

1968 Camaro - 461 RHS LS 700hp, various stuff, called Bad Penny
1968 Camaro - In progress, called Track Rat
2010 Camaro - DSE Suspension, Baer 6S Brakes, Boze Wheels, Nitto NT05 Tires, JBA Exhaust and long tubes, Magnacharger TVS, 660rwhp Forged Eagle 416 LS3 short block, ADM fuel system, Lingenfelter GT-9 cam, G-Force axles, Anvil and Seibon CF parts, Centerforce Dual-Disc Clutch

www.fquick.com/steve1968ls2
Steve1968LS2 is offline   Reply With Quote