View Single Post
Old 04-27-2013, 06:35 PM   #57
NemeSS
 
Drives: Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
My 01 Ranger with the 3.slow V6 averages around 17.5. Geez why did Ford ever put the 3.0 in the Ranger when the 4.0 had much more power at basically the same MPGs.

I'm excited to see what the new Colorado/Canyons offer, but in reality I think people that want these trucks really just want small Ranger size trucks with beds and great MPGs. We don't want to pull a damn boat, we just need the convenience of the bed is all. If the smaller trucks don't get a sizable amount of MPGs over their big brothers....its a fail.
big fail imo
my dd full size rcsb 2000 1500 gmc sierra 4.8/60e gets 24mpg on 87.
stock everything. just a ebay cai and a canned tune. it runs side by side with 2v gt mustangs and stock.lt1 cars
NemeSS is offline   Reply With Quote