So brand X makes 4HP over stock when cold.
JacFab makes 21HP over stock when cold.
Assuming that brand X is who we all expect it to be, these 2 CAI's are not THAT different in design to logically explain a difference of 17HP from one to the other. That seriously makes me question this data and the accuracy of it with there being such a huge difference.
No matter how hard this guy has worked, and how much testing he has done, and how much time and energy he has into his product (and I am
NOT discounting any of that) we are expected to believe that there is that big of a difference between the 2 systems? I mean aren't many always saying that some of these gains that companies make are ridiculous, but this one is supposedly making
17HP MORE than what we are all assuming is the leading competitor, and in this test that company only made 4hp?
It just does not add up. The simple fact that YOU are testing YOUR OWN product, which YOU will be making money off of if ever released, after YOU have spent so much of your own resources on leaves a huge bias.
If your CAI makes that much power and is that much better than the competition I would be the first to check it out. I think some reputable 3rd part testers (not your local dyno shop where you and the guy might be buddies) that we know and trust around here need to verify these #'s, because they simply don't add up to me, as well as some of the posters above judging from a few of the comments.
Again I want to believe you, but the gains just seem way to far apart for it to be accurate compared to everything we have been seeing here from so many others.