View Single Post
Old 08-14-2013, 04:28 PM   #9
CGT
 
Drives: 2011 SSm6
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: St.Louis
Posts: 355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA View Post
Am I the only one sick of all the snake oil dyno claims from companies on their headers. I'd be happy to setup the engine dyno so we can do a side by side engine dyno comparison on every header available if some of you guys want to do it. I've already done the testing on a lot of brands before, but I'd be happy to do it with a few camaro5 guys if we can get some guys that want to come down and help.

That's the best way to get a good honest side by side comparison.....
Yes, I am also sick of it. But there other claims on here that bother me just as much if not more. Ive seen quite a few sets of headers swapped and tested accurately, that were alot different from each other than just someone elses brand of 1 7/8.. And its rare to see anything huge, if so its usually down really low in the rpm range, way below peak torque and those gains I've seen came from collector extensions or a change to 4-2-1 from 4-1 headers.

Would love to see some good, honest testing under controlled conditions on a repeatable dyno. But the results wont matter to most on here who simply like to regurgitate unsubstantiated claims. The fact that you have a dog in the hunt(TSP headers) will kill the credibility of the testing with some people anyway. But I'm definitely game.
CGT is offline   Reply With Quote