View Single Post
Old 12-03-2013, 03:43 PM   #10
meissen
Founder - Michigan FBody
 
meissen's Avatar
 
Drives: 1994 Camaro LT1, 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Haven, MI
Posts: 2,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by v6sonoma View Post
I don't think people are reading things. The Camaro had a year over year increase of 14%. That's a good thing. Mustangs was only 1%. So most likely this is typically a slow month for the Camaro and it did far better than last year and even better still than the year prior.

THANK YOU..

Apparently people only look at graphs and see the Mustang selling more units than the Camaro and instantly it's applied to their short-sighted bias against the 2014 Camaro.

Come on people - let's put on our critical thinking caps. If the Camaro sold 14% more units (or about 709 Camaros) November 2013 than November 2012, how is the 2014 refresh a fail? They sold 709 more Camaros this past November than they did November 2012. Of course we don't have a break down of how many were 2013s vs 2014s so we can't conclusively say that the refresh is a success but it CERTAINLY isn't a failure.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikes SS View Post
sure looks like to me that the Camaro refresh is not doing so well...with the new mustang right around the corner that the mustang sales should be down and not the Camaro's...2 months in a row they are down and coincidentally it has been 2 months since the refresh
PS - The Camaro sales in October 2013 were up 11% compared to October 2012... Again, not down compared to year after year sales.
__________________
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 - "Zooma"
1994 Camaro LT1 A4 - "Red Alert" - v6-to-LT1 Swapped Cruiser; Cammed, Stalled, Enjoyed

"Gone But Not Forgotten"
2016 Camaro 1LT A8 - "Elmo"
2014 Camaro 1LT M6 - "Cherry Bomb"
2012 Camaro 1LS M6 - "Clifford"


Michigan FBody Association
http://www.mifbody.com/
meissen is offline   Reply With Quote