Quote:
Originally Posted by LOWDOWN
Note corrections.
RE: which BOSS? Listen closely, or turn up the volume, @ 1:40
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=ybUOyjGIUqQ
I suspect Dave Pericak knows the difference.
I'm not sure Cotter does...as further in your quoted article, Cotter shares THIS tidbit: " Cotter said he couldn't confirm what would come in the Track Pack for the 2015 Ford Mustang as of yet because it hadn't been finalized". Spoken like a true Communications flak. But it'll outrun the [non-GM-engined] LS... trust me.
And which one is the Chief Engineer? Dave Pericak. |
Don't know why you corrected my "Laguna Seca" to "LS". Please explain. I suppose you know something I don't know. There is a Boss 302 and a Boss 302 Laguna Seca (aka LS for short) as far as I know.
That's how it appears as 1.39 time at the Laguna Seca track lap records.
The Boss 302 ran there at 1:40.2 so either way the 2 cars are very close especially given the latter comes with streets. As to the claims, who knows, perhaps the Chief Eng was conservative, or the Comm guy totally out of the loop. Seems strange as he specifically mentioned the Laguna Seca edition lap time (1:39 vs 1:40). But surely I'd take the former source as accurate. Either way both are very close. As to actuals, i am sure we will hear a lot more (and hopefully one consistent story) on the 13th. The interesting part (for me) here is that Pobst piloted the Z51 there to 1:38 in comparison.