[BSX_Camaro]

The funny part of the arguments "in defense" of the dealer aren't seeing the true picture.

The employee "DIDN'T" break into the dealership. He was given access. Without the access the crime wouldn't have happened in the first place. He didn't pick a lock or break a window. THAT is the point where the dealer needs to accept the responsibility. Taking the car off lot wasn't approved as they mention over and over again but the access to commit the crime WAS approved.

Do I expect the dealer to "give" him a new 2014 ZL1? No, but their current offer is a joke. To make it right, they need to give the OP equivalent or better than what he had. IF that means a 14 ZL1, so be it. But the only opinion that matters is the OPs. I for one would expect more than the current offer as well. The current offer shows that the dealer isn't accepting responsibility of their ex-employee's actions as a representative of their dealership WITH ACCESS to commit the crime in the first place.