View Single Post
Old 02-24-2014, 10:43 PM   #1
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
Dyno tune vs email. Comparison

With all the talk about remote tuning, thought i'd post up my results. This is a popular SCT custom email tune on the thin line and a GPI dyno tune on the bold. Car is a L99, Kooks 1 3/4 headers with HFC's, and a Halltech Yellowjacket. No hero runs here. Car was at operating temps before the logs were run. 4X runs on the email tune to get a baseline and used the best repeatable run. Rhino (GPI) did a great job and was very professional. VVT tables were properly set to get the most HP/Tq at the earliest rpm.

This isn't posted to bash remote tuning, but for many to understand the reasoning why some people say to dyno tune whenever possible. IMO, you can't see the fine tuning needed for getting the most from your car with just logs. You can get close if you have a GOOD tuner that pays close attention to the logs but there's always a little left on the table.




[IMG][/IMG]
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline