Quote:
Originally Posted by 102SS
Who cares? the original owner has not met his obligations for what ever reasons.
The bank owns it now and it will roll through the auction.
Mr Repo man has a tough enough job without everyone throwing him under the bus.
|
That's just rationalization of unprofessional behavior. By your logic its OK for Policemen to take apples for free because they have a tough job.
The repo man's job is
not to ruin a car that the bank now owns, and it's not to accelerate wear on the vehicle. His job is to secure the vehicle for the bank. Bottom line here is, the vehicle is not his. This is not any different at all from a tech at a GM shop taking a customer car and doing burnouts in the parking lot, except that you forgive the repo man for his actions because you sympathize with him- even though you never met this man in your life.
Getting thrown under the bus means you're getting a raw deal. There's no injustice here. This guy
did the thing that would be reported. He did it, he decided to do it and he knows he shouldn't. That's called "being held responsible for your actions". F that guy. I'm held accountable for my behavior, why isn't he held accountable for his exactly? A "tough job"? Well, sounds like that tough job should be done by a
pro, not some
cowboy punkass, to me. Nobody gets a free pass to damage property that they don't own, in my book. Not you, not me, not this jerk repo man.
The
repo man just made his tough job harder, not anybody else.