Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad70supreme
If you think a stock 392 is keeping up with a well setup H/C camaro there is nothing more I need to even say.
|
I agree
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEADfoot927
The OP said enough. He said he assumes his car is making around 453-440 rwhp. An edmunds article did a dyno on the 392 and it had 452 whp. Although i think it is high, being both cars are around the same weight I think it is plausable that the 392 could hang with the OP's car. Not trying to start an arguement I love both cars.
http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/t...no-tested.html
"It happens that we dynoed our long-term 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS on this very dyno last year. That's pretty much an ass-kicking, particularly in the midrange where the 392 wallops the Camaro's LS3 V8 by some 100 lb-ft. |
I have said it before and I will say it again. You can't compare chassis dyno numbers from two completely different cars on two completely different dyno's on two completely different days. Way too many variables one of them being the drivetrain loss will be different.