|
Saying someone's arguments are flawed while supplying OPINIONS (not facts) to support yourself is flawed.
Just because you like the bumper that several people have expressed a strong distaste for doesn't make you "right".
My argument is that the bumper deviates significantly from the concept cars bumpers. There's no flaw in that argument. The rest of the things I said about wasing money on unnecessary changes is just incing on the cake. They spent money making the car un-concept-like and spent time doing it. If this type of waste is rampant at GM then this is reason to believe all their cars are not efficiently designed and overall the prices reflect the efficiency of the company.
Even if you do a bunch of handwaving and dismiss the wasteful practice of braking stuff that didn't need rework and say this is a flawed argument, you still can't convince me that there's a reason to make such a radical departure from the concept that everyone loved.
Meanwhile, I'm not alone in my position. Yet you try and speak as if I'm the lone dissenter. MANY people don't like the change.
|