Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010-1SS-IBM
That's a weak argument. No one stares at a car because it is new.
Who can even tell a new car from one that's 2 years old, anyway? Is the 2010 Mustang getting more stares than the 2009?
As I said, weak argument.
Edit - As far as the rating goes, it is subjective. But giving the Camaro an 11.2 is just wrong and shows a lot of bias. I actually prefer the Mustang's exterior over the Camaro's, but not by much (probably rate them 14 to 13.5). The Challenger's probably the hardest to rate because it's styling is so retro; it could be rated ahead of both Mustang and Camaro depending on how much you appreciate retro styling.
|
i look at new cars more than i look at old cars. and yes, the 2010 mustang is getting more stares than a 2009. even the 2010 equinox gets more looks than a 2009. im not saying that a 2006 mustang gets more stares than a 2005, they look the same.
when they change the styling, (not change year models with no changes) people are like "hey, i havent seen that before" the frist time the see it. the next time "theres that new camaro again" and so on.
the only reason its a week argument is because there have been no studies comparing how many looks an 2009 mustang gets compared to a 2010....i think we know what the results would be. just because you cant cite a source doesnt make it week. personal experience is a form of evidence