|
Possibly but what modification! prove its not a betterment say? I still would discuss with the bank. To me that would be like saying you put an addition on your home so we cant warranty the rights in your mortgage agreement. Actually the proof of said modification lies with the defendant(GM) to prove the case. The plaintiff ( OP) has an issue; 3 mechanics reports need to be obtained first outlining the cause and hopefully would outweigh said modification unless proven to be the cause with specific detail that would show say a failed part was due to what ever outside of say bad oil pump. OP really needs to first get official reports from 3 other certified mechanics, then prepare a letter to GM and one to the first dealership also following others findings. OP needs to make a notarized letter request in writing of issue ( to include problem and your demand, don't include what was said via phone as no proof and that's hear say, keep it simple and facts only). . Phone calls are no no as you have no proof and its hear say. letter is fact and proof along with the reports from the other mechanics. You must request a response and give a deadline of a response expectation. In turn they will see you are moving in a direction of a fact and you have a legal proof paper trail. They know they can say anything on a phone but a document is worth a thousand words. Sad you have to deal with this issue instead of just enjoying driving the car you are paying for but truth is if this goes to court id rather see you have proof documents a judge would look at seriously and not hear what he said she said.
|