Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponchonutty
/\ ditto above. The M vs. M act clearly states that in order to allow a dealer/vehicle manufacturer to deny warranty because of the installation of said part, they must prove with out a doubt that either the product or the way it was installed was a direct cause of failure to the affected vehicle. Failure to do so means they have to uphold the warranty and/or supply similar product free of charge PERIOD! Anyone with $.02 worth of mechanical knowledge knows a catch can will in no way cause the issues at hand. This dealer and GM are clearly going against Federal Law
|
That's not what it says, now stop with the nonsense ...