View Single Post
Old 01-23-2017, 03:56 PM   #7
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Quote:
Originally Posted by gringo View Post
It makes me wonder why GM made the intake flow 10% better on the Canyon/Colorado twins compared to the Camaro.

If anything, you would think the low to mid range torque requirement would be a priority (since they are trucks) while the Camaro would get the 10% better flowing intake for higher peak HP numbers.
It probably had more to do with fitment/packaging than performance.
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote