Quote:
Originally Posted by Tal
Just at first glance you rather obviously ignored the ride quality advantage of the Camaro. You also mistakenly list the Mustang as having more interior room, the Camaro has 93 cubic feet of passenger space and 11 cubic feet of trunk space compared to the Mustang's 86 and 13. I had to look that one up as I just didn't believe the Camaro's interior was smaller having been in both. I did find Motor Trend making a quip about the Camaro's interior being smaller before I found the actual numbers so I'll mark that mistake down to Motor Trend doing their car reviews from the back seat and trunk areas rather than the drivers seat (which explains so much more about some of their other reviews).
*The steering advantage is rather questionable on Mustang's without the trackpack which isn't an option on V6 models (at least so far), although it is an advantage for GT buyers that pony up the extra $1500.
|
Again, once you put everything in the basket, their pros cancel each other out.
Camaro Ride/Mustang Handling
Interior: Mustang
Room: The numbers say Camaro, but the room the Mustang has seems more usable after sitting in both I didn't the Camaros low roof at all, the Mustang seemed to be more headroom friendly. i would most likely call it a draw.
Visibility out the cabin: Mustang
power: Camaro
Brakes: Camaro
ith the Steering the on center feel should be the same with all Mustangs, it's the speed of the steering that changes in the Track Pack.