Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro5
Crap?
Yeah, but that's Mrs. Ronald.
Aftermarket vendors are going to be all over this. Disco lighting, following lighting, chase mode, remote controlled brightness, dances to the music, patterns and colors.
Another vote for the 1SS versus 2SS. 
 |
So, why does GM need the aftermarket vendors to do it right when, as your pic shows, the technology is already available?????
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOLDDOG
We should all happy to get this car anyway we can. With the outlook for GM getting worse everyday, there may be no Camaro next year or any GM vehicle. Look around GM Inside News, its alot worse them most people would like to believe.
|
Sorry, but that's absurd.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UCF w00t
If my dash get's jacked because of heat, I'll be pissed. And for that reason, I'm thinking that this is not the reason they pulled ABL. If it was heat, why would the doors be any different? Aren't they the same material? Until we get a reason otherwise, it's +1 for the bean counters.
|
There may be some heat at the source, but a significant amount will not propagate out through the light tube. Plastic tubing is not a good heat sink. That's also absurd.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3
CTS has lighting on the dash. Light pipe across the I/P and through the doors.
|
Exactly, so why, when time started running short for the problematic new lighting technology, didn't they begin working on a backup contingency plan using the CTS's already tried and true technology?