Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23
you realize that GM/Chevy did that years ago. it was called the LT5. and while it was a bad little beast, the LS1 proved to be a much more viable route. the more "technology" that is shoved into a motor does not make it better. all that means is more stuff to break/go wrong.
|
by viable you mean cheaper to produce? i disagree with the second point.. the v6 in the cts/camaro is a great engine...
