Quote:
Originally Posted by IAI80
And here is a recent WSJ op/ed piece that refutes your view. I had to laugh when you include NPR and the Washington Post as some pure source of facts. I don’t expect you to change your mind with a WSJ piece anymore than you should expect anything from NPR or the Post to change someone else’s. Facts?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-k...s&page=1&pos=6 |
Does not refute whatsoever. My contentions were Obama had better numbers. He did. That contention was Trumps are more sustained. We shall see. See how that works? I can make a rational assessment of empirical data without screaming “fake”, you lot seem incapable of doing so. Funny how that works.