Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr pogo
that is true, perhaps unproven is the better description of his accusations.
but then that leads to why, without knowing the whole story, he went from just defending the dealer to attacking the Hooper's intentions?
just reading the PQ posts that I quoted, I wouldnt say that is level headed.
|
I got stronger in text because I was groing ever more baffled at the one sided opinions when we only had one side of the story.
Again, I do not know John Hooper or his wife. Don't think that I did not see that it may appear as if I were blasting the man personally.
Tell you what .... Go back and read them again and just put 'Person X' in all of my references of Hooper and put 'Person Y' in all of my references of the dealer. That's all I was saying. I said 'The OP' many times to try and keep that conveyance. My points were in that intention. Only as to how it appeared to me.
But never mind the appearance of me attacking John and his wife. My only intention was to try and get everyone to see that we only have one side of a complex story.