Quote:
Originally Posted by Milk 1027
It was to keep the cars in the same price range.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverTurtle
I think they did it right... top of the line vs. top of the line... the prices were within dollars of each other and the results have, so far, all been pointed towards the Camaro pulling ahead of the Mustang in every respect.
something to think about is that the Camaro and Challenger have IRS and the Mustang doesn't... so testing the Mustang without the track pack puts it at a very heavy disadvantage in handling, but a distinct advantage in pricing... I would rather see a dollar to dollar test than a base vs. base test.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N
+1
otherwise $$ vs $$ it wouldn't be fair.
|
Absolutely agreed. Can't give the Mustang guys something to complain about in the comparison. Now the Camaro kicked its a$$ fair and square.
