Quote:
Originally Posted by renke
For Spyderbuddy,
I actuall came up with the same number of 335 with 92 octane. The guys at St. Paul Automotive who ran the car on the Mustang dyno said to expect 20-30 HP less than the DynoJet results before we ran the dyno and when it came out to 264 rwhp they conld not believe it and ran it 4 more times. I realize that the runs were on two different dynos. Next year the 100 octane run will be on the same Mustang Dyno. For now I am not going to do anything to the car. Also to answer the person who doubted the GM engineer claim, he parked next to me in the lot at MID America Automotive and was driving the GM High Performance Semi and had the orange and black GM Performance clothes. Either way I will settle the issue for my car on the next dyno runs with 100 octane. The GM shop manuals provide a lot of the theory behind the design of the 3.2 L V6 and bears out the engineers story.    |
Cool don't forget to let us know when you get that Dyno pull