10-21-2014, 01:33 PM | #1 |
Track > 1/4 Mile
|
Physical Size - LS3 vs Coyote
I know I have seen this a couple of times before but cannot find where people have posted it.
What is the weight of each and does someone have a picture comparing the physical size of the two? I know the LS3 has a much smaller overall physical size.. *EDIT* Never mind, found this thread..
__________________
|
10-21-2014, 03:22 PM | #2 |
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6 Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
|
How could you even read that thread? So many hypocrites...
|
10-21-2014, 03:50 PM | #3 |
Just a car guy
Drives: 2016 Durango R/T AWD Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 808
|
Pulled from Chevy and Ford.
2014 SS 190.6 x 75.5 (W/O Mirrors) x 54.2 (L, W, H) 2015 Mustang GT 188.3 x 75.4 (W/O Mirrors) x 54.4 Are you looking for older model Coyotes? 2014 GT 188.5 x 73.9 (W/O Mirrors) x 55.8 Overall, the Camaro is longer, but, the Mustangs are taller/wider. 2015 GT weight - 3700LBS with a Base/Auto 2014 GT 3501 W/Manual - Base. Hope this helps, this is what I could find without getting to involved in searching.
__________________
2016 Durango R/T AWD
2014 5.0 - Ported CobraJet Manifold - SCJ Mono-Blade TB - Kooks 1-3/4" LT Headers - Kooks O/R H-pipe - Custom Intake - McLeod clutch line - Borla S-Type Axle Backs - AED Tuned - 443 RWHP / 388 RWTQ - GONE 05 GT - Sold 03 Cobra - Gone (Never Forgotten) |
10-21-2014, 07:15 PM | #4 |
Drives: '14 1le Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 486
|
He was talking about the motors of each cars.
Anyhow, keep searching bc I remember seeing it on here with pics also. |
10-21-2014, 07:26 PM | #5 |
Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
the coyote is more space and material inefficient.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|